List of reports and articles reviewed

AAS. 2020. Priority Areas of Support on Climate Change and Development in Africa: Outcome Document of the AAS Climate Change Experts Consultative Meeting. Addison, P. F., Bull J. W., and Milner‐Gulland, E. 2019. Using conservation science to advance corporate biodiversity accountability. Conservation Biology, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 307–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13190 Adler, R., Mansi, M., and […]

  1. AAS. 2020. Priority Areas of Support on Climate Change and Development in Africa: Outcome Document of the AAS Climate Change Experts Consultative Meeting.
  2. Addison, P. F., Bull J. W., and Milner‐Gulland, E. 2019. Using conservation science to advance corporate biodiversity accountability. Conservation Biology, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 307–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13190
  3. Adler, R., Mansi, M., and Pandey, R. 2018. Biodiversity and threatened species reporting by the top Fortune Global companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 787–825. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2016-2490
  4. Akhtar, F., and Rehmani, M. H. 2015. Energy replenishment using renewable and traditional energy resources for sustainable wireless sensor networks: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 45, No. C, pp. 769–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.021
  5. Allen, B., and Tamindael, L. E., Bickerton, S. H., and Cho, W. 2020. Does citizen coproduction lead to better urban services in smart cities projects? An empirical study on e-participation in a mobile big data platform. Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 37, No. 1, p. 101412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101412
  6. Atkins, J., Maroun, W., Atkins, B. C., and Barone, E. 2018. From the Big Five to the Big Four? Exploring extinction accounting for the rhinoceros. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 674–702. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-12-2015-2320
  7. Auestad, N., and Fulgoni III, V. L. 2015. What current literature tells us about sustainable diets: emerging research linking dietary patterns, environmental sustainability, and economics. Advances in Nutrition, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 19–36. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.114.005694
  8. Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., Piquer-Rodríguez, M., Velasco-Muñoza, J. F., and Manzano-Agugliaro, F. 2019. Worldwide research trends on sustainable land use in agriculture. Land Use Policy, Vol. 87, p. 104069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104069
  9. Bai, X., Colbert, M., McPhearson, T., Roberts, D., Siri, J., Walsh, B., and Webb, B. 2019. Networking urban science, policy and practice for sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Vol. 39, pp. 114–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.08.002
  10. Bibri, S. E., and Krogstie, J. 2017. Smart sustainable cities of the future: an extensive interdisciplinary literature review. Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 31, pp. 183–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.02.016
  11. Bilali, H., 2019. Research on agro-food sustainability transitions: a systematic review of research themes and an analysis of research gaps, Journal of Cleaner Production, 221, pp. 353–64, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.232
  12. Blicharska, M., Smithers, R. J., Mikusiński, G., Rönnbäck, P., Harrison, P. A., Nilsson, M., and Sutherland, W. J. 2019. Biodiversity’s contributions to sustainable development. Nature Sustainability, Vol. 2, No. 12, pp. 1083–93. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0417-9
  13. Boiral, O., and Heras-Saizarbitoria, I. 2017. Managing biodiversity through stakeholder involvement: why, who, and for what initiatives? Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 140, No. 3, pp. 403–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2668-3
  14. Bonilla-Bedoya, S., Mora, A., Vaca, A., Estrella, A., and Herrera, M. Á. 2020. Modelling the relationship between urban expansion processes and urban forest characteristics: an application to the Metropolitan District of Quito. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems,Vol. 79, p. 101420.
  15. Caniglia, G., Luederitz, C., von Wirth, T., Fazey, I., Martín-López, B., Hondrila, K., König, A., von Wehrden, H., Schäpke, N. A., Laubichler, M. D., and Lang, D. J. 2020. A pluralistic and integrated approach to action-oriented knowledge for sustainability. Nature Sustainability,Vol. 4, pp. 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00616-z
  16. Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., and Esposito, E. 2018. Environmental sustainability and energy-efficient supply chain management: a review of research trends and proposed guidelines. Energies,Vol. 11, No. 2, p. 275. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11020275
  17. Chang, R.-D., Zuo, J., Zhao, Z.-Y., Zillante, G., Gan, X.-L., and Soebarto, V. 2017. Evolving theories of sustainability and firms: history, future directions and implications for renewable energy research. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 72, pp. 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.029
  18. Chavarro, D., Tang, P., and Rafols, I. 2014. Interdisciplinarity and research on local issues: evidence from a developing country. Research Evaluation, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 195–209.
  19. Clark, R., Reed, J., and Sunderland, T. 2018. Bridging funding gaps for climate and sustainable development: pitfalls, progress and potential of private finance. Land Use Policy, Vol. 71, pp. 335–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.013
  20. Cornell, S., Berkhout, F., Tuinstra, W., Tàbara, J.D., Jäger, J., Chabay, I., de Wit, B., Langlaish, R., Mills, D., Moll, P., Otto, I. M., Petersen, A., Pohll, C., and van Kerkhoff, L. 2013. Opening up knowledge systems for better responses to global environmental change. Environmental Science & Policy, Vol. 28, No. 0, pp. 60–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.008
  21. del Río Castro, G., Fernández, M. C. G., and Colsa, Á. U. 2020. Unleashing the convergence amid digitalization and sustainability towards pursuing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): a holistic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 280, p. 122204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122204
  22. Delina, L. L., and Sovacool B. K. 2018. Of temporality and plurality: an epistemic and governance agenda for accelerating just transitions for energy access and sustainable development. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Vol. 34, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.05.016
  23. Digital Science, 2020. Contextualizing Sustainable Development Research. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9._gshare.12200081
  24. Dolšak, N., and Prakash, A. 2018. The politics of climate change adaptation. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, Vol. 43, pp. 317–41. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-025739
  25. Dora, C., Haines, A., Balbus, J., Fletcher, E., Adair-Rohani, H., Alabaster, G., Hossain, R., de Onis, M., Branca, F., and Neira, M. 2015. Indicators linking health and sustainability in the post-2015 development agenda. Lancet, Vol. 385, pp. 380–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60605-X
  26. EASAC, 2020. Towards a sustainable future: transformative change and post-COVID-19 priorities, A Perspective by EASAC’s Environment Programme.
  27. Ebi, K. L., Harris, F., Sioen, G. B., Wannous, C., Anyamba, A., Bi, P., Boeckmann, M., Bowen, K., Cissé, G., and Dasgupta, P. 2020. Transdisciplinary research priorities for human and planetary health in the context of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 17, No. 23, p. 8890. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17238890
  28. Edler, J., Cunningham, P., and Gök, A. 2016. Handbook of Innovation Policy Impact, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  29. Ehrensperger, A., de Bremond, A. Providoli, I., and Messerli, P. 2019. Land system science and the 2030 agenda: exploring knowledge that supports sustainability transformation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Vol. 38, pp. 68–76, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.04.006
  30. Enfors, E. 2013. Social–ecological traps and transformations in dryland agro-ecosystems: using water system innovations to change the trajectory of development. Global Environmental Change, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.10.007
  31. European Climate Foundation. 2018. NET ZERO BY 2050: zero emissions pathways to the Europe we want.
  32. Fauzi, R. T., Lavoie, P., Sorelli, L., Heidari, M. D., and Amor, B. 2019. Exploring the current challenges and opportunities of life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 3, p. 636. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030636
  33. Fazey, I., Moug, P., Allen, S., Beckmann, K., Blackwood, D., Bonaventura, M., Burnett, K., Danson, M., Falconer, R., and Gagnon, A. S. 2018. Transformation in a changing climate: a research agenda. Climate and Development, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2017.1301864
  34. Fazey, I., Schäpke, N. et al. 2020. Transforming knowledge systems for life on Earth: visions of future systems and how to get there. Energy Research & Social Science,Vol. 70, p. 101724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101724
  35. Fedele, G., Donatti, C. I., Harvey, C. A., Hannah, L., and Hole, D. G. 2019. Transformative adaptation to climate change for sustainable social-ecological systems. Environmental Science & Policy,Vol. 101, pp. 116–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.07.001
  36. Feola, G. 2015. Societal transformation in response to global environmental change: a review of emerging concepts. Ambio, Vol. 44, No. 5, pp. 376–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0582-z
  37. Foran, J. 2019. System change, not climate change: radical social transformation in the twenty-first century. in The Palgrave Handbook of Social Movements, Revolution, and Social Transformation,Berch Berberoglu, Switzerland, Springer, pp. 399–425.
  38. Frank, A. S., and Schäffler, L. 2019. Identifying key knowledge gaps to better protect biodiversity and simultaneously secure livelihoods in a priority conservation area. Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 20, p. 5695. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205695
  39. Frank, B., and Kalfagianni, A. 2020. Planetary justice: a research framework, Earth System Governance, Vol. 6, p. 100049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2020.100049
  40. Frantzeskaki, N., and Rok, A. 2018. Co-producing urban sustainability transitions knowledge with community, policy and science, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, Vol. 29, pp. 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.08.001
  41. Furstenau, L. B., Sott, M. K., Kipper, L. M., Machado, E. L., Lopez-Robles, J. R., Dohan, M. S., Cobo, M. J., Zahid, A., Abbasi, Q. H., and Imran, M. A. 2020. Link between sustainability and industry 4.0: trends, challenges and new perspectives. IEEE Access, Vol. 8, pp. 140079–96. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3012812
  42. Future Earth. 2020. Digital disruptions for sustainability: managing the digital age is a climate issue.
  43. Garcia-Llorente, M., Rubio-Olivar, R., and Gutierrez-Briceno, I. 2018. Farming for life quality and sustainability: a literature review of green care research trends in Europe. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 15, No. 6, p. 1282. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15061282
  44. Giles-Corti, B., Lowe, M., and Arundel, J. 2020. Achieving the SDGs: evaluating indicators to be used to benchmark and monitor progress towards creating healthy and sustainable cities. Health Policy, Vol. 124, No. 6, pp. 581–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.03.001
  45. Glandon, D., Meghani, A., Jessani, N., Qiu, M., and Bennett, S. 2018. Identifying health policy and systems research priorities on multisectoral collaboration for health in low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Global Health, Vol. 3, p. e000970.
  46. Gluckman, P., and Hanson, M. 2006. Mismatch: Why Our World no Longer Fits our Bodies, 1st ed, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  47. Gordon, D. J., and Johnson, C. A. 2018. City-networks, global climate governance, and the road to 1.5°C. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability,Vol. 30, pp. 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.02.011
  48. Haberl, H., Wiedenhofer, D., Pauliuk, S., Krausmann, F., Müller, D. B., and Fischer-Kowalski, M. 2019. Contributions of sociometabolic research to sustainability science. Nature Sustainability,Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 173–84. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0225-2
  49. Hassan, A. M., Roberts, L., and Atkins, J. 2020. Exploring factors relating to extinction disclosures: what motivates companies to report on biodiversity and species protection? Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 1419–36.
  50. Hossain, M. U., Ng, S. T., Antwi-Afari, P., and Amor, B. 2020. Circular economy and the construction industry: Existing trends, challenges and prospective framework for sustainable construction. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 130, p. 109948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109948
  51. Hu, X., and Chong, H.-Y. 2019. Environmental sustainability of off-site manufacturing: a literature review. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 332–50, https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-06-2019-0288
  52. Hynes, W., Lees, M., Müller, J. M. 2020. Systemic Thinking for Policy Making: The Potential of Systems Analysis for Addressing Global Policy Challenges in the 21st Century. Paris, France, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/879c4f7a-en
  53. Institute for Scientific Information. 2019. Navigating the Structure of Research on Sustainable Development Goals.
  54. International Science Council. 2020. Conversations on Rethinking Human Development, International Science Council, Paris.
  55. International Science Council. 2020. Open Science for the 21st Century, Draft ISC Working Paper.
  56. International Science Council. 2021. Opening the record of science: making scholarly publishing work for science in the digital era. Paris, France, International Science Council. https://doi.org/10.24948/2021.01
  57. IPBES. 2019. Summary for policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Chapter 5. Pathways towards a Sustainable Future.
  58. Kabisch, S., Finnveden, G., Kratochvil, P., Sendi, R., Smagacz-Poziemska, M., Matos, R., and Bylund, J. 2019. New Urban Transitions towards Sustainability: Addressing SDG Challenges (Research and Implementation Tasks and Topics from the Perspective of the Scientific Advisory Board (SAB) of the Joint Programming Initiative (JPI) Urban Europe). Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 8, p. 2242. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082242
  59. Köhler, F., Geels, W. et al. 2019. An agenda for sustainability transitions research: state of the art and future directions, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, Vol. 31, pp. 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004
  60. Lange Salvia, A., Leal Filho, M., Londero Brandli, L., and Sapper Griebeler, J. 2019. Assessing research trends related to Sustainable Development Goals: local and global issues, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 208, pp. 841–49, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.242
  61. Le Gal, E. 2016. Exploring new research directions for achieving a sustainable future: what can be learned from the biofuel weed risk case study? Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 55–78.
  62. Lee, H.-T., Song, J.-H., Min, S.-H., Lee, H.-S., Song, K. Y., Chu, C. N., and Ahn, S.-H. 2019. Research trends in sustainable manufacturing: a review and future perspective based on research databases. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 809–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-019-00113-5
  63. Li, Y., Yang, J., and Song, J. 2017. Design structure model and renewable energy technology for rechargeable battery towards greener and more sustainable electric vehicle. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,Vol. 74, pp. 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.021
  64. Mastrángelo, M.E., Pérez-Harguindeguy, N., Enrico, L. et al. 2019. Key knowledge gaps to achieve global sustainability goals. Nature Sustainability,Vol. 2, pp. 1115–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0412-1
  65. Mayhew, S. H., Newman, K., Johnson, D., Clark, E., Hammer, M., Mohan, V., and Ssali, S. 2020. New partnerships, new perspectives: the relevance of sexual and reproductive health and rights for sustainable development. Health Policy, Vol. 124, No. 6, pp. 599–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.03.010
  66. McElwee, P., Turnout, E., Chiroleu-Assouline, M., Clapp, J., Isenhour, C., Jackson, T., Kelemen, E., Miller, D. C., Rusch, G., and Spangenberg, J. H. 2020. Ensuring a post-COVID economic agenda tackles global biodiversity loss. One Earth 3 (4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.09.011
  67. Mechler, R., Stevance, A.-S., et al., 2021. Transformations within reach: Pathways to a sustainable and resilient world – Enhancing Governance for Sustainability. IIASA Report. IIASA-ISC.
  68. Mulatu, K. A., Mora, B., Kooistra, L., and Herold, M. 2017. Biodiversity monitoring in changing tropical forests: a review of approaches and new opportunities. Remote Sensing, Vol. 9, No. 10, p. 1059. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9101059
  69. Næss, P. 2016. Built environment, causality and urban planning. Planning Theory & Practice, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 52–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2015.1127994
  70. Nagendra, H., Bai, X., Brondizio, E. S. et al. 2018. The urban south and the predicament of global sustainability. Nature Sustainability,Vol. 1, pp. 341–49. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0101-5
  71. Neeff, T., and Piazza, M. 2020. How countries link forest monitoring into policy-making. Forest Policy and Economics, Vol. 118, p. 102248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102248
  72. Nielsen, J., and Farrelly, M. A. 2019. Conceptualising the built environment to inform sustainable urban transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, Vol. 33, pp. 231–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.07.001
  73. Nielsen, U. N., Stafford-Smith, M., Metternicht, G. I., Ash, A., Baumber, A., Boer, M. M., Booth, S., Burnside, D., Churchill, A. C., and El Hassan, M. 2020. Challenges, solutions and research priorities for sustainable rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, Vol. 42, No. 5, pp. 359–73. https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ20059
  74. Nowotny, H., Scott, P. B., and Gibbons, M. T. 2013. Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Oxford, John Wiley & Sons.
  75. O’Brien, K. 2016. Climate change and social transformations: is it time for a quantum leap? WIREs Climate Change,Vol. 7, pp. 618–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.413
  76. Overland, I., and Sovacool, B. K. 2020. The misallocation of climate research funding. Energy Research & Social Science,Vol. 62, 101349, pp. 1–13, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3514503
  77. Pauliuk, S. 2020. Making sustainability science a cumulative effort. Nature Sustainability, Vol. 3, pp. 2–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0443-7
  78. Pelling, M., Leck, H., Pasquini, L., Ajibade, I., Osuteye, E., Parnell, S., Lwasa, S., Johnson, C., Fraser, A., and Barcena, A. 2018. Africa’s urban adaptation transition under a 1.5 climate. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability,Vol. 31, pp. 10–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.11.005
  79. Phelps, D., and Kelly, D. 2020. A call for collaboration: linking local and non-local rangeland communities to build resilience. The Rangeland Journal, Vol. 42, No. 5, pp. 265–75. https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ20048
  80. Pitasi, A., Brasil Dib, N., and Portolese, G. 2018. Legislative innovation. Towards a global law. Making process: the case of global citizenship policy modelling. International Review of Sociology, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 392–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2018.1529102
  81. Prieur-Richard, A-H., Brenna., W. et al. 2019. Global Research and Action Agenda on Cities and Climate Change Science – Full Version.
  82. Rafique, S. F., Shen, P., Wang, Z., Rafique, R., Iqbal, T., Ijaz, S., and Javaid, U. 2018. Global power grid interconnection for sustainable growth: concept, project and research direction. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution,Vol. 12, No. 13, pp. 3114–23.
  83. Ramankutty, N., and Coomes, O. T. 2016. Land-use regime shifts: an analytical framework and agenda for future land-use research. Ecology and Society, Vol. 21, No. 2, p. 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08370-210201
  84. Randers, J., Rockström, J., Stoknes, P.E., Golüke, U., Collste, D., and Cornell, S. A. 2018. Transformation is feasible: How to achieve the sustainable development goals within planetary boundaries. A report to the Club of Rome from Stockholm Resilience Centre and BI Norwegian Business School
  85. Reade, C., Thorp, R., Goka, K., Wasbauer, M., and McKenna, M. 2015. Invisible compromises: global business, local ecosystems, and the commercial bumble bee trade. Organization & Environment, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 436–57.
  86. Ren, R., Hu, W., Dong, J., Sun, B., Chen, Y., and Chen, Z. 2020. A systematic literature review of green and sustainable logistics: bibliometric analysis, research trend and knowledge taxonomy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 17, No. 1, p. 261. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010261
  87. Roberts, L., Hassan, A., Elamer, A., and Nandy, M. 2021. Biodiversity and extinction accounting for sustainable development: a systematic literature review and future research directions. Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 705–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2649
  88. Rogge, N., Theesfeld, I., and Strassner, C. 2020. The potential of social learning in community gardens and the impact of community heterogeneity. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction,Vol. 24, p. 100351.
  89. Rovenskaya, E., Kaplan, D., and Sizov, S. 2021. Transformations within reach: Pathways to a sustainable and resilient world – Strengthening Science Systems. IIASA Report. IIASA-ISC.
  90. Rozhenkova, V., Allmang, S., Ly, S., Franken, D., and Heymann, J. 2019. The role of comparative city policy data in assessing progress toward the urban SDG targets. Cities,Vol. 95, p. 102357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.026
  91. S20. 2020. Foresight: Science for Navigating Critical Transitions.
  92. Sachs, J.D., Schmidt-Traub, G., Mazzucato, M., Messner, D., Nakicenovic, N., and Rockström, J. 2019. Six Transformations to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Sustainability,Vol. 2, pp. 805–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0352-9
  93. Schindler, S., Mitlin, D., and Marvin, S. 2018. National urban policy making and its potential for sustainable urbanism. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Vol. 34, pp. 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.11.006
  94. Schneider, F., Kläy, A., Zimmermann, A.B., Buser, T., Ingalls, M., and Messerli, P. 2019. How can science support the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development? Four tasks to tackle the normative dimension of sustainability. Sustainability Science,Vol. 14, pp. 1593–1604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00675-y
  95. Schot, J., and Steinmueller, W. E. 2018. Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, Vol. 47, No. 9, pp. 1554–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011
  96. Shibin, K., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Dubey, R., and Mishra, D. 2016. Sustainable consumption and production: need, challenges and further research directions. International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 447–68. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPMB.2016.079678
  97. Shrivastava, P., Stafford Smith, M., O’Brien, K., and Zsolnai, L. 2020. Transforming Sustainability Science to Generate Positive Social and Environmental Change Globally. One Earth, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 329–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.04.010
  98. Silva, S., and Guenther, E. 2018. Setting the research agenda for measuring sustainability performance–systematic application of the World Café Method. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal,Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 455–69. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-06-2017-0060
  99. Sperling, F., Havlik, P., Denis, M., Valin, H., Palazzo, A., Gaupp, F., and Visconti, P. 2020. Transformations within reach: Pathways to a sustainable and resilient world – Resilient Food Systems. IIASA Report. IIASA-ISC.
  100. Srivastava, L., Gomez Echeverri, L., and Schlegel, F. 2021. Transformations Within Reach: Pathways to a Sustainable and Resilient WorldSynthesis Report. Laxenburg, Austria, IIASA and ISC.
  101. Timko, J., Le Billon, P., Zerriffi, H., Honey-Rosés, J., de la Roche, I., Gaston, C., Sunderland, T. C., and Kozak, R. A. 2018. A policy nexus approach to forests and the SDGs: tradeoffs and synergies. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability,Vol. 34, pp. 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.06.004
  102. Tortajada, C., and Biswas, A. K. 2018. Achieving universal access to clean water and sanitation in an era of water scarcity: strengthening contributions from academia. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability,Vol. 34, pp. 21–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.08.001
  103. Trutnevyte, E., Hirt, L. F., Bauer, N., Cherp, A., Hawkes, A., Edelenbosch, O. Y., Pedde, S., and van Vuuren, D. P. 2019. Societal transformations in models for energy and climate policy: the ambitious next step. One Earth, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 423–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2019.12.002
  104. Turner, C., Aggarwal, A., Walls, H., Herforth, A., Drewnowski, A., Coates, J., Kalamatianou, S., and Kadiyala, S. 2018. Concepts and critical perspectives for food environment research: a global framework with implications for action in low- and middle-income countries. Global Food Security, 18, pp. 93–101, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2018.08.003
  105. TWI2050 – The World in 2050. 2018. Transformations to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Report prepared by the World in 2050 initiative. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria.
  106. TWI2050 – The World in 2050. 2019. The digital revolution and sustainable development: opportunities and challenges. Report prepared by the World in 2050 initiative. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria. Available at www.twi2050.org.
  107. Uchiyama, C., Stevenson, L. A., and Tandoko, E. 2020. Climate change research in Asia: a knowledge synthesis of Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change Research (2013–2018). Environmental Research,Vol. 188, p. 109635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109635
  108. UN GSDR. 2019. Independent Group of Scientists appointed by the Secretary-General, Global Sustainable Development Report 2019: The Future is Now Science for Achieving Sustainable Development,United Nations, New York.
  109. UN. 2020. UN Research Roadmap for the COVID-19 Recovery.
  110. UNDP. 2020. Human Development Report 2020. The Next Frontier: Human Development and the Anthropocene.
  111. UNEP. 2021. Making peace with nature: a scientific blueprint to tackle the climate, biodiversity and pollution emergencies. Nairobi. https://www.unep.org/resources/making-peace-nature
  112. Van Bers, C., Delaney, A., Eakin, H., Cramer, L., Purdon, M., Oberlack, C., Evans, T., Pahl-Wostl, C., Eriksen, S., Jones, L., Korhonen-Kurki, K., and Vasileiou, I. 2019. Advancing the research agenda on food systems governance and transformation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability Vol. 39, 94–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.08.003.
  113. Van Hoof, L., Fabi, G., Johansen, V., Steenbergen, J., Irigoiene, X., Smith, S., Lisbjerg, D., and Kraush, G. 2019. Food from the ocean; towards a research agenda for sustainable use of our oceans’ natural resources. Marine Policy, 105, pp. 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.02.046
  114. Visbeck, M. 2018. Ocean science research is key for a sustainable future. Nature Communications, Vol. 9, p. 690. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03158-3
  115. WEF. 2020. The 2020 Global Risks Report.
  116. WEF. 2020. The Future of Nature and Business.
  117. Wolfram, M., and Frantzeskaki N. 2016. Cities and systemic change for sustainability: prevailing epistemologies and an emerging research agenda. Sustainability, Vol. 8, No. 2, p. 144. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8020144
  118. Wyborn, C., Montana, J. et al. 2020. Research and action agenda for sustaining diverse and just futures for life on Earth. Biodiversity Revisited. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12086.52804/2
  119. Yegros-Yegros, A., Rafols, I., and D’este, P. 2015. Does interdisciplinary research lead to higher citation impact? The different effect of proximal and distal interdisciplinarity. PloS One, Vol. 10, No. 8, p. e0135095. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135095
  120. Zahraee, S. M., Shiwakoti, N., and Stasinopoulos, P. 2020. Biomass supply chain environmental and socio-economic analysis: 40-years comprehensive review of methods, decision issues, sustainability challenges, and the way forward. Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 142, p. 105777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105777
  121. Zakeri, B., Paulavets, K., et al. 2021. Transformations within reach: Pathways to a sustainable and resilient world – Rethinking energy solutions. IIASA Report. IIASA-ISC.
  122. Zhao, X., Ke, Y., Zuo, J., Xiong, W., and Wu, P. 2020. Evaluation of sustainable transport research in 2000–2019. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 256, p. 120404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120404
  123. Zierhofer, W., and Burger, P. 2007. Disentangling transdisciplinarity: an analysis of knowledge integration in problem-oriented research. Science & Technology Studies Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 50–72. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.55219

Go back: A priority action agenda for science

Share:

Skip to content