The one-and-a-half day workshop , which kicked off with a lively discussion on opportunities and challenges facing the new organization, was followed by a meeting of the Strategy Working Group for another day-and-a-half.
The full three-day meeting was intended to generate a draft strategy document which will be then submitted for approval to the executives of the two organizations and their members.
The panel for the discussion included:
- Helga Nowotny: Professor Emerita of Social Studies of Science, ETH, Zurich
- Craig Calhoun: President of the Berggruen Institute
- Robbert Dijkgraaf: Director of the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton
- Philip Campbell: Editor-in-Chief, Nature
- Flavia Schlegel: Assistant Director-General for Natural Sciences, UNESCO
- Nada Al-Nashif: Assistant Director-General for Social and Human Sciences, UNESCO
Issues discussed ranged broadly across topics such as the future of the sciences, important priorities for a new Council, new stakeholder groups that should be engaged, among other things. To watch the recording, click here. You can read the social media round-up of the discussion here.
The importance of advocacy emerged as a popular orientation for a future organization, for example to advocate for the importance of science itself, or the importance of evidence-based policy-making. Participants also saw a role for a council in in upholding the universality of science and freedom of scientific exchange There was debate around the importance of the UN’s Agenda 2030 on sustainable development as a “signature” programme, as well as the challenge of tackling new topics such as artificial intelligence.
The Strategy Working Group will meet again at the end of May 2017. Its meeting is followed on 3-4 February 2017 by a meeting of the Transition Task Force, which is designing a proposed organizational structure and statutes for the new organization.