The dual burden of inequality and disaster-risk

On this International Day, we take a closer look at the link between inequality, disaster resilience, and the urgent need for equitable solutions. Join our discussion with Hélène Jacot des Combes, the new Project Manager at the International Science Council, as we discuss the complex dynamics at play between inequality and disasters.

The dual burden of inequality and disaster-risk

The goal of this year’s International Day for Disaster Risk Reduction, with the theme “Fighting inequality for a resilient future”, is to address the complex relationship between poverty, inequality, and disasters. The day aims to raise awareness of the vicious circle around inequality and disaster-risk. Poverty, discrimination, and inequality all contribute to and are exacerbated by disaster risks, as vulnerable and marginalized communities are disproportionately impacted, which, in turn, worsens inequality.

To further explore the issue, the ISC has caught up with Hélène Jacot Des Combes, its new Project Manager for Hazards Definition and Hazard Information Profiles.

With a background in Paleoceanography, Hélène spent a decade researching historical ocean changes before dedicating 15 years to climate change and disaster risk management in the Pacific small island states. Her work spanned eight years in Fiji and five years in the Marshall Islands, involving research, training, teaching, and collaboration with decision-makers.

She recently joined the International Science Council as a project manager responsible for reviewing and updating the hazard definitions and associated hazard information profiles – a collaboration between the ISC and the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, aiming to enhance understanding of hazards and facilitate information sharing using standardized terminology.

Hazard Definition & Classification Review: Technical Report

The UNDRR/ISC Sendai Hazard Definition and Classification Review Technical Report provides a common set of hazard definitions for monitoring and reviewing implementation which calls for “a data revolution, rigorous accountability mechanisms and renewed global partnerships”.

This year’s International Day for Disaster Risk Reduction emphasizes the role of growing inequality in driving risk and vulnerability to disasters. Could you explain the connection between inequality and disaster risk and discuss potential strategies to address this issue?

HJDC: When a hazard affects a population, the impact is not uniform; it varies depending on individuals’ resources and vulnerability. Those more vulnerable will experience more severe effects during a disaster and take longer to recover. Therefore, it is crucial to ensure that all individuals are affected as little as possible and have the opportunity to recover.

Of course, inequality plays a significant role in this context, manifesting in various ways. One aspect is exposure; people with fewer resources often live in high-risk areas, as those with more means tend to avoid such areas. Sensitivity is another aspect, with individuals of limited income or savings being more adversely affected. Additionally, coping capacity is influenced by resources, as individuals without resources or access to information struggle to prepare and respond effectively. Inequality does not create hazards, but it profoundly influences how people experience and respond to them. Therefore, disaster risk reduction must address both hazards and the preparedness and response of vulnerable populations. Reducing poverty and inequality should be integral to this effort.

Given the global disparities in vulnerability to climate-related risks and disasters, particularly with the Global South disproportionately affected, what mechanisms can ensure climate justice and equitable adaptation worldwide?

HJDC: There are mechanisms in place, but the challenge lies in effective implementation. For instance, we are currently midway through the Sendai framework, and the ISC Report for the Mid-Term Review of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction provides insights into what has been accomplished and what remains to be done. In addition to addressing resource disparities among countries and regions, we must prioritize including local practitioners, actors, and scientists in capacity-building and knowledge co-production. Local expertise is often lacking, as external researchers conduct most work, which may address immediate concerns but is less sustainable in the long term.

Report for the Mid-Term Review of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction

The report identifies achievements in disaster risk reduction (DRR) since 2015 under the Sendai Framework and highlights key implementation gaps and provides guidance with the goal of helping the development of a governance framework beyond 2030 that integrates risk reduction as a key factor in sustainable development.

A holistic approach is necessary, as inequalities are interconnected with sustainable development and climate adaptation. Combining these aspects under the same umbrella can be more effective, especially for regions in the Global South with limited resources. We also need to shift from focusing solely on specific events to adopting a systems approach. The Systemic Risk Briefing Note by the ISC underscores the need to consider the entire system surrounding hazards and disasters, including inequality reduction. Data and information deficits in the Global South are also a concern, as we lack comprehensive monitoring systems for events, risk reduction actions, and inequality reduction strategies. We must overcome these challenges and adopt more comprehensive and integrated approaches, as the Global South’s limited resources require us to avoid duplication and resource wastage.

Systemic risk briefing note cover

Systemic Risk

This Briefing Note represents an integrated perspective of climate, environmental and disaster risk science and practice regarding systemic risk. It provides an overview of the concepts of systemic risk that have evolved over time and identifies commonalities across terminologies and perspectives associated with systemic risk used in different contexts.

Given the recent disasters in Libya, Morocco, Afghanistan, Syria, and Türkiye, why is this year’s theme particularly important? How do you envision the future of disaster risk reduction in the face of increasing disaster frequency and severity?

HJDC: The recent disasters in these regions highlight the disproportionate impact on vulnerable populations. Inequalities become starkly evident, as those with fewer resources struggle to build resilient homes, often settling in high-risk areas. This underscores the critical need for enhanced early warning systems. Achieving this requires a comprehensive approach, encompassing hazard monitoring, infrastructure monitoring, effective communication, and ensuring messages are understandable and actionable, even for those with limited education.

For this, training and community capacity-building are essential components. Many tools are already available, such as building codes and zoning policies, but their accessibility must be ensured for all, even those with limited resources. Mechanisms to help people afford better housing, even if they lack the upfront funds, are vital. By making these tools accessible, we can reduce the vulnerabilities of marginalized communities and promote equitable disaster risk reduction.

Is there a specific message or call to action you’d like to convey to the ISC audience on this International Day for Disaster Risk Reduction?

HJDC: I want to emphasize that disaster risk reduction is a collective responsibility. New tools, like hazard information profiles, are being developed to standardize and make information more accessible. These tools are useful for various partners and communities to build their capacity. But everyone can contribute by becoming better prepared and informed. However, coordination and information exchange among different actors are essential.

Science plays a pivotal role in this endeavor. We should not fear science; it is for everyone. We can all make a difference, and science is an invaluable tool to do so. The key is not only to produce scientific knowledge but also to ensure it is used effectively, bridging the gap between science and policymaking. Better communication, coordination, and science utilization are vital for effective disaster risk reduction.

Closing the gap between science and practice at local levels to accelerate disaster risk reduction

This policy brief analyses the existing gap between science and technology (S&T) and its incorporation into disaster risk management at local levels.

Newsletter

Stay up to date with our newsletters

Sign up to ISC Monthly to receive key updates from the ISC and the broader scientific community, and check out our more specialized niche newsletters on Open Science, Science at the UN, and more.

Photo by Jonathan Ford on Unsplash

VIEW ALL RELATED ITEMS

  • Disclaimer: The translations are automatically generated by Google Translate and may contain errors. The ISC is not liable for any damage or issues that may arise from these translations. You can provide your feedback by emailing us at webmaster@council.science
    Note: Please note that the ‘Science Summit at the UN General Assembly’ in September 2023 is not an event of the International Science Council. The International Science Council has no association with this event nor with the organizer of the event.
    • Skip to content